I do not really understand why they don't support this themselves, but Google Analytics will not track keywords for Google image search. Instead it just shows up as "referrer". A site I'm webmaster for, Swing and the City, gets a lot of image search exposure (funnily for an image that is gone since August, Google also needs to work on their index, too), so it was a bit odd to have images.google.com show up as top referrer but not "organic search".

Here's the code I use to fix this:

var r=document.referrer;
if(r.search(/images.google/)!=-1 && r.search(/prev/)!=-1){
 var e=new RegExp("images.google.([^\/]+).*&prev=([^&]+)");
 var m=e.exec(r);
 pt._addOrganic("images.google","q",true);
 pt._setReferrerOverride("http://images.google."+m[1]+unescape(m[2]));
};
pt._addOrganic("maps.google","q",true);
pt._addOrganic("forestle.org","q",true);
pt._trackPageview();

Note that image search is more complicated than the maps and forestle search engines I also add for keyword tracking. The original query is encoded in the "prev" parameter, and the easiest (or only?) way to get working tracking is to use the ReferrerOverride function of analytics.

Note: this is not a straight copy & paste, since I use this code in a compressed and encoded (for injection into the page via DOM ops) form. So no guarantee of syntax completeness. You'll need to adjust it to your variable naming anyway (I use "pt" instead of "pageTracker"). This is just to show you the use of unescape on the "prev" parameter for this purpose.

I wonder if it's possible to identify link spammers (you know, these bots that mass-submit a link into as many blogs/etc they can find in order to boost their page rank) by the simple measure of how many of the links to their site are marked 'nofollow'.

Say, a regular page should have less than 5% (and less than 20) nofollow links; a site that goes significantly above this value probably employs some spam bot.

The only really hard thing is how to avoid attacks on a site using this ... say, I write a bot that spams links to Microsoft on as many sites as it can find that DO use 'nofollow', in order to get that site above the limit, and have google penalize it.

So in general I don't think Google would automatically penalize such things, still it could be used to e.g. have a human check the destination site for useful content, and then only blacklist when it doesn't seem to be useful.

P.S. Which BTW is a reason why some of the SEO "do nots" are bullshit: it would be too easy to deliberately use these to blacken a competitor. So a 'link farm' will at most do nothing to raise your ranking; but Google must not allow you to actually lower a competitors ranking by setting up a link farm to him!)

P.P.S. On another side note: Who guarantees that Google actually ignores "nofollow" links? They could also just be assigned a lower weight or a penalty, so that a "nofollow" link from a strong site such as Wikipedia would still be worth a lot, while the average blog comments page link goes down to 0. Say a "nofollow" link from a PR 6 site is as much worth as a regular link from a PR 4 site, and PR 2 becomes PR 0. Would already do much of the trick in discouraging the use of blog spam bots. Because after all, ignoring the links on Wikipedia for page rank would be quite stupid. In German Wikipedia, the page contents are even "sighted" (aka: peer reviewed); this is a rather trustworthy source, especially when you take time effects into account. A link being constantly in Wikipedia on a popular page for more than a month very likely is good.

These days, something happened to one of my external USB drives that I so far only knew from ReiserFS (which I since called ReisswolFS, German word play on "shredder" ...). But, it's not ext3 which I blame.

Short story what happened:

• Resumed the system from 'suspend'.
• I copied some files onto the first file system.
• I copied the same files to a second external disk (dual backup...)
• I copied some files from the first disk, which caused an access-beyond-end-of-disk, mounting the filesystem read only
• Unmounted the filesystem, started e2fsck
• Started copying the files from the secondary filesystem
• Got the same error on the second disk.
• Cancelled e2fsck doing more damage to the first disk.
• Shutdown and reboot
• Memcheck, three iterations. Nothing.
• Checked second disk, no errors in filesystem (!), copied the files I had issues accessing just fine.
• Filesystem on disk #1 seriously trashed.
• Had ext2fsck try to recover filesystem on disk #1
• Pretty much all data on disk #1 is now in lost+found, it seems as if all major folders were corrupted. Lots of corrupted file entries (character devices with random permissions and numbers) there, too.

• Reformat disk #1, and restore it from the other backup (Extra backup for teh win! I also have a 3rd copy of about 2 months ago off-site)

As you can see, something was wrong with the system, not with the file system.

I have a strong suspect to have caused this. In case you wondered why I included "resumed from suspend" above: I've been having system stability issues with resume ever since upgrading to the Intel driver 2.9.0 and KMS (Debian unstable+testing) with kernels up to 2.6.31. In about 1 out of 5 resumes, I get a Xorg or system lockup after anything from 1 to 60 minutes. Sometimes I also experience video corruption after a few minutes, trashing some terminal emulation until the next redraw. Just before writing this email I had a typical lockup: when scrolling the terminal emulator. This has been a typical trigger for lockups. On contrast I havn't seen any such crashes (or screen corruption) on a fresh boot.

Freedesktop bug reporting the same issue closed as "not our bug, blame it on the kernel".

Note that 2.6.32 release candidate Changelog contain many changes for the intel DRI kernel driver. So the bug might already be fixed in the RC kernels.

Same report in Kernel Bugzilla is still 'NEW' though.

Related bug report in Debian, blaming it on KMS.

[Update: I've disabled KMS and upgraded to 2.6.32-rc8 and not had such a crash since. But I can't pinpoint it to one or the other yet.]

[Update: just tried another external harddisk ...

[305032.148616] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
[305066.061708] usb 1-8.3.3: reset high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 27
[305081.132471] usb 1-8.3.3: device descriptor read/64, error -110
...
[305147.468857] sd 4:0:0:0: Device offlined - not ready after error recovery
[305147.468880] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] Unhandled error code
[305147.468886] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] Result: hostbyte=DID_ABORT driverbyte=DRIVER_OK
...
[305147.473500] WARNING: at /build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.32~rc8-1~experimental.1-i386-g1b8iG/linux-2.6-2.6.32~rc8/debian/build/source_i386_none/fs/buffer.c:1159 mark_buffer_dirty+0x20/0x7a()

When I got my Google Wave account, it took the invitation about a week to arrive. A few days ago, I got my first own invites, and invited some colleagues (in an attempt to actually find a use for Google Wave beyond "rich media live messaging"). Within a few minutes they were "in". Now I just got my second set of invites. So is Google Wave now getting ready for mass opening, rocketing user numbers?

As you might have already guessed, I'm not convinced by Google Wave. It's technically interesting and well-done. The demos are all nice. It's just that the UI in the browser is a bit fragile and cumbersome, and the big question so far is:

What does Google Wave allow you to do that you couldn't do before?

• You can use it for mail, but it only works with other users of Wave and lacks good offline operation.
• It beats pretty much any instant messaging in functionality, but the UI isn't well for running in background. Most IM clients have a great UI for "background" operation.
• Collaborative editing - I prefer having a real editor and real files for that. Check out Gobby for that. I've heard Wave is good for remote brainstorming, though.
• Social networking, read "facebook". Wave doesn't have all the filtering stuff that Facebook is still trying hard to get useful. Just wait until someone releases "Mafia Wars" for Wave ...
• Blogs. Sure, I could do a 'Blog Wave' and invite my friends there. Makes sense for small-audience private blogs; not for blogs like mine where I mostly write to people that I do not know.
• Games. This probably is the current killer app on Wave: Sudoku. Although the (widespread) implementation sucks somewhat. Magnetic Poetry is a nice idea, but doesn't even work in Chrome for me properly ...
• All the web 2.0 stuff just gets on my nerves. I'm not going to use it for my blog; I by design do not have comments on my blog, either. Being able to web 2.0 everything doesn't make up for a lack in benefits.

Yes, I'm aware that you should differentiate between the protocol and the ui. Still pretty much everything is currently designed for the web browser with full JavaScript and Flash capabilities.

Of course this isn't the end yet, Google Wave will evolve. Maybe into something cool, maybe it will remain just a niche thing. Maybe some cool apps will just use Wave as protocol. But I figure, I'll mostly wait for these things to happen first before I become a frequent user of Wave.

The biggest thing I see is the "spam" (this especially includes 'Quiz', Mafia Wars and similar Scamville type of 'apps' that surely will show up in no time, once Wave is open to the public). What will Wave provide to me to handle this flood of worthless information that I'm getting more and more?

P.S. Please don't bother to ask for invitations to Wave.

P.P.S. here's how to replace the odd scrollbars with the regular OS scrollbars with a really simple user style (CSS).

Starting 01/01/2008, Bavaria had introduced a quite hard smoking ban, which also included bars and restaurants. It however contained a backdoor by excluding non-public locations, which led to the creation of 'smoker clubs' where you had to become a member to be admitted. At some point, most clubs were of this kind.

In August 2009, however, the law was changed to exclude beer tents (Oktoberfest ...) and small bars. Many people belive that this was to get votes on the elections in september 2009 (which ended up in a minus of 6-7% compared to the previous election and a historical low for the biggest party).

This caused several organizations to call for a public vote on restoring the smoking ban to the 2008 state (without the 'smokers club' backdoor). In order to force a public vote on a law (without the governments support!), we need 10% of the voters to register as supporters for the vote. You have to register at your registered home town. For Bavaria, this means about 940.000 supporters.

If you are registered voter in Bavaria, please drop by your municipality and sign up. You need an ID and 5 Minutes, that's all. 940.000 supporters is an incredible lot of people to get to the offices, take along your friends!

When we get enough supporters, the Bavarian government has two options: accepting the changes as proposed (and thus making the initative obsolete), or conducting a public vote on it, offering an alternative (e.g. the current law, no change) and have the voters decide (which is quite expensive, so if many many people sign up, they might save that money and just pass the proposed change themselves).

For more information (german only), check the Nichtraucherschutz Bayern Website, including the sign up office locations.

P.S. In other European countries, the introduction of a strong smoking ban has led to a 10-15% decrease in heart attacks (20% for non-smokers). The german constitutional court has also already ruled that the protection of non-smokers and employees from passive smoke weights stronger than the individual's freedom to smoke in enclosed spaces.

We'd like to host DebConf 2011 in Munich, Germany.

However, this is a far from trivial challenge:

Rent in Munich, in particular for conference rooms, is far from cheap. In my opinion, unless we get some really big sponsor (and I'd still prefer spending sponsor money to fund developer trips to the DebConf instead!), the only chance we have is to get some rooms at the university.

However given the development of the recent years (budget etc.), it has become a lot more difficult to actually get rooms at the university for such events. Unless the event is considered to be fully a part of the universitys "work", we might have to pay rent to the university. Which again isn't that affordable.

Anyway, if you are in Munich, working at one of the universities, or in any way interested in supporting DebConf 2011 in Munich, please join the DebConf11 Germany mailing list. Also check our meetings scheduled on the DebianMuc Wiki page, currently every Monday, 18:00, at the new LiMux offices in Sonnenstr.

P.S. There will also be a Bug Squashing Party in Munich end of November: Munich BSP November 2009