Vitavonni

Thu, 15 Feb 2007

False sense of security

This post of ubuntu-tutorials.com (via Planet Ubuntu) suggests to run sshd on a different port than 22.

That does not increase security.

Serious attackers aren't fooled by just changing the port; if someone has an SSH remote exploit we're all in deep trouble anyway (but that code is heavily audited, you bet!), and it's trivial to scan on other ports if a system is detected as being Unix and not having SSH on port 22.

If you want to really increase security, you can

  • Disallow password logins altogether, use cryptographic keys or One Time Passwords [wikipedia]
  • Enforce (sufficiently) secure passwords
  • Filter by source IP from trusted networks only
  • Use port knocking [wikipedia]; use iptables RECENT match for this, not some obscure tcpdump-running shell script!
  • Require multi-hop or VPN connections (e.g. have a tighly secured firewall host, for example with SELinux, which users can only use to forward their connection to their real destination host)

If your goal actually is to get rid of those annoying (but non-threatening, if you don't have trivial passwords) messages in your log files (you DO read your log files, don't you?) - consider using the iptables RECENT match to stop them early.

At the university, we have a RECENT match filter at the border firewall. It stops SSH scanners early on, giving them 5 tries total for the whole network (and they usually give up after that, not retrying when the recent match has expired).

For some details on how to use the RECENT match for filtering SSH connections, read this earlier blog post on iptables SSH protection. Use the INPUT chain to filter localhost.

For an example how to do a two-hop SSH connection, read this blog post. Just replace his OpenWRT router with a tighly secured SELinux gateway system. Another (without nc) is to use the LocalForward option of ssh. Just forward some local port through one ssh connection to the final machine, then do a second ssh connection over this. The gateway host could easily be restricted to only allow outgoing connections to port 22 in the fenced off network.

So basically, by NOT using a different port than 22 for SSH, you can increase security (by filtering port 22 specially, knowing that it's SSH). If you start putting your SSH daemons on different ports, you're actually making firewalling much harder.

Also note that in some networks, bandwidth policies are used for different ports. The SSH port usually is not limited; arbitrary ports are (since it might be a filesharing application using them). Another reason to stick to the standard ports, so you don't get punished by your network administrators!

[category: /en/linux | Permalink]
Menu
[planet.debian]
[planet.xmlhack]
[planet SELinux]
[munichblogs]
[email]
[RSS 2 feed]
[English RSS 2]
Categories
< February 2007 >
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728   
Archives
2010-Jul
2010-Jun
2010-May
2010-Apr
2010-Mar
2010-Feb
2010-Jan
2009-Dec
2009-Nov
2009-Oct
2009-Sep
2009-Aug
2009-Jul
2009-Jun
2009-May
2009-Apr
2009-Mar
2009-Feb
2009-Jan
2008-Dec
2008-Nov
2008-Oct
2008-Sep
2008-Aug
2008-Jul
2008-May
2008-Apr
2008-Mar
2008-Feb
2008-Jan
2007-Dec
2007-Nov
2007-Oct
2007-Sep
2007-Aug
2007-Jul
2007-Jun
2007-May
2007-Apr
2007-Mar
2007-Feb
2007-Jan
2006-Dec
2006-Nov
2006-Oct
2006-Sep
2006-Aug
2006-Jul
2006-Jun
2006-May
2006-Apr
2006-Mar
2006-Feb
2006-Jan
2005-Dec
2005-Nov
2005-Oct
2005-Sep
2005-Aug
2005-Jul
2005-Jun
2005-May
2005-Apr
2005-Mar
2005-Feb
2005-Jan
2004-Dec
2004-Nov
2004-Oct
2004-Sep
2004-Aug
2004-Jul
Other links:
Swing and the City - Lindy Hop in Munich